Looking through old pictures from 2000, trying to find a particular photo, I spotted a mass of images from my last office in midtown. I have no memory of taking or even seeing these pictures but I think they were taken as I tried out some new camera gear and gadgetry at the office.
I tend to obliterate obvious memories from my skull, favoring the random and unlikely, and my memories of corporate favor incidental life experiences over professionalism or “career”. Little if anything from my corporate experience informs what I do today, reflecting not the uselessness of corporata but the swiftness with which life can change. It seems appropriate to me that these images are mostly distorted or warped, reflecting the shape of my memories of this place. Memory itself, I think, looks like this.
I have no nostalgia for my corporate youth, nor do I have any regrets. “Regrets” might seem a strong word, but one could resent a period of life spent staring into a computer screen, toiling away for someone else’s benefit. I rarely have reason to recall specifics about my corporate youth, though I am friends with some former colleagues who occasionally talk to me like I still inhabit that world. To hear them describe it today that world (limited not just to this company) seems to comprise continuous layoffs and job eliminations as a once-mighty publishing industry seems to shrivel a little more with each ever-thinner magazine issue. Any business, it seems, that depends on sales of printed matter for its subsistence is in peril, regardless of its heritage.
I remember the feeling of exhaustion that came from expending so much energy on fear — fear of getting fired, fear of not getting fired and thus taking on the work of those who did, fear that someone else getting fired will go ape shit and tear up the office — fear like this is not necessarily rational and it is rarely productive, but for today’s ephemeral reporting structures it is common enough as to not even be called fear. You take on new projects with an eye toward who would be responsible for them after you get fired, and with a plan on how you will re-group on this project when that person gets fired and you get re-hired.
I used to think getting fired from a job was like being murdered or excommunicated from a church. You didn’t look at the fired ones. You didn’t talk to them. You turned away, unable to expose yourself to the grotesque splattering of professional disembowelment and personal humiliation.
I don’t think of firings like that now. Everybody gets fired, bestowing no particular privilege or honor on those who “survive” at a company, and branding those who do the firings with the only enduring stigmas. Nowadays I feel that if you’ve never been fired from a job then something isn’t right. It’s like you haven’t lived.
I worked at corporate for one purpose: to pay off my student loans and other debts, and then establish some sense of financial stability. It must be 11 years ago now but I remember the one mouse click that paid off a long-time credit card bill, leaving it at the $0 monthly balance at which all my credit cards have remained ever since. Debtlessness is the greatest freedom, and the finest form of wealth. Even a $10 bar tab weighs heavily on my sense of serenity. I have never liked money, and I aim simply to have all that I need. [I think I just paraphrased a line from the television show The Adventures of Black Beauty.] At corporate I felt more and more conspicuous with every pay-raise, and for me conspicuity breeds discontent — especially financial conspicuity. Nevertheless (and due mostly to the inertia that comes from simply having a job) I remained at corporate longer than I would have had I stayed true to my initial intent of using the job strictly for money to pay off debts. I finally got fired in 2001, which was the luckiest thing to happen to my work life since getting hired at that company in 1995, but I imagine I might return to similar environs one day.
I pass by this office once in a while, sometimes trying to tell what goes on in there now. The office was bigger than my first three New York City apartments combined, and had more windows than all the apartments I have ever lived in. I think it was turned into a conference room, though I saw boxes piled high for some time, suggesting it was used for storage.
∞
I like the “then and now” conceit. Simple yet revealing, one takes a picture or a description of a person or a place from some time ago and holds it up for comparison to that person or place today. This seemingly simple assignment can be challenging, especially when images of a place are decades apart. I did something like this a couple of years ago when I re-traced the steps of the funeral scene from The Godfather. I did it again on Wednesday , when I found myself standing in Times Square, holding in front of me a black and white printout of this amazing picture, trying to find the spot at which it was taken. This picture is from my collection of slides. It was taken by a Coloradoan visiting Manhattan’s Times Square in 1942.
Times Square, 1942
The following picture comes close to the spot at which the above was taken, but I will try again because I want to get this right.
Times Square, 2009
The frames of reference here are the white building in the lower left and the tan brick building on the right, seen in my picture behind the modern-day T.G.I. Friday’s sign and in the 1942 picture behind an empty billboard. The exact placement of the first picture would be more to the right, though if memory serves that would have put me right out in the middle of 7th Avenue, dodging vehicular traffic and — more perilously — invective-spewing bicyclists.
There are, obviously, a lot more buildings now, and a lot more taller buildings at that. Times Square looks so small in 1942. The signage where the Ruppert Beer sign used to be now climbs virtually to the sky. Samsung and HSBC appear to have called PEnnsylvania 6-5300 to buy that previously empty billboard and the air space above.
What I find eye-popping about the 1942 Kodachrome slide is its color. Pictures from the 1940s are usually in black and white, and I would think that a certain segment of the American mind assumes that life itself was in black and white up until television and print media were in color.
The venerable Shorpy.com shows this picture of Times Square in 1943, all in black and white and, by certain modern standards, not a little bit dreary because of it. Black and white does sap the superficial out of a subject as gaudy as Times Square, but I prefer black and white story-telling in film and photography. It signifies a departure from reality and asserts that what you see is, in fact, only a story — a work of art distinct from your ordinary life.
My acquisition of the 1942 Times Square photo also coincides with my recent pre-occupation with Telephone Exchange Names. I originally posted a single story with a series of exchange name sightings but the page got too big to deal with. I broke it up into a picture essay to which I will add more exchange names as I spot them. I collected most of the pictures I already have of exchange name sightings around New York, and in place of some of the less usable old pictures I got new shots of the same places while occasionally spotting new (to me) exchange names on the sides of warehouses and manufacturing plants in Queens and Manhattan.
The PEnnsylvania Exchange Name seen in this 1942 picture is, of course, long gone. The number today goes to a law firm by the name of Block, O’Toole, & Murphy. Their number is 212-736-5300, but would formerly have been PEnn6-5300. I think it would be pretty cool to discover that a primitive version of my phone number once stood over the so-called Crossroads of the World.
∞
|
I have tried to avoid use of the royal “I” in writing words on paper or on screen. Like use of the verb “to be” it seems like a weakness — resorting to what I think or what specific circumstances I experienced — when the greater story is what happened outside, or at best because of me. It is an adjunct of my social belief that good listeners make the best conversation.
Lately, in the privacy of my head, I have taken this elimination of I to another level by removing the trap of my from accounts of things which seem to belong to me but are ephemeral. I started at this some months ago after a mundane conversation about a grocery store coupon. An older woman commented “I took my coupon to the WalMart…” Her use of “my” stuck out like a thorn. Your coupon? You earned it? Do you enter a WalMart, coupon in hand, with such pride in that scrap of paper that you claim it is yours? The physical coupon itself, that sacrificial interstitial vehicle of commerce that you clipped from a newspaper or printed off a web page is not really yours. It is not WalMart’s. At best it belongs to the manufacturer. If the responsibility of a human being for an item’s existence is the standard of ownership then I expect the real owner of this “woman’s” coupon could be traced to a marketing manager somewhere in the company that produces the product(s) on the coupon. The coupons function as reconnaissance vessels, and while they pass through the fingers and hands of individual consumers and cashiers I think it unclear whether a coupon ever becomes the property of anyone along the way. This philosophical point has likely been addressed elsewhere, but I invoke the dilemma of ownership as an example of a petty weakness in human communication. I own nothing on this earth, even the flesh on these bones will one day be stripped bare, but like most humans I find myself describing “my” this and “my” that in reference to objects and passings that only slip through my fingers like sand. Between sentences here I stop to sip my coffee. My coffee? What makes it mine? Is it because you don’t have it? I could simplify the account by saying “I sip coffee”, or we could disembody it to a universality by saying “Coffee is sipped.” By my standards of the moment I think that a satisfactory account of consuming this coffee must eliminate ownership of the product. This coffee is like that grocery store coupon: an interstitial material presence no more mine than yours, which belongs to me no more than the water I drank from a public water fountain yesterday. And yet at coffee shops and diners I will hear myself refer to “my coffee” or “my sandwich” as I come to believe that this contradistinction of possessiveness is false. Nothing is owned. Nothing is mine. Nothing is yours. I even find myself turning back the notion of my thoughts. “My” ideas are not mine but a composite mash of surrounding concepts, regurgitated back into the pool of thought. Nothing germinates in a genuinely cloistered space that is solely mine, or solely yours. |
∞
I am sitting in the far, far reaches of my apartment, in the bedroom, sitting in The Chair next to the heater and the air conditioner, both contraptions working on me, competing, one generating heat and the other blasting cold air at my face. The apocalypse could rage in the living room and I would not hear it. I am listening to Mahler’s 4th Symphony and typing mostly by the light of this computer screen, with help from a 99-cent clip-on light. I nearly ended that previous sentence with an irrelevant temporal flourish. I lazily came close to mentioning the length of time between now and the date I purchased that clip-on light. But no. I deferred to efficiency of expression, and I clipped from this monologue the irrelevance of how long ago this light entered my life. I find myself frequently appending sentences with useless mentions of how long ago something happened or did not happen, and to stomp out that frivolous habit I bend back the spoon by eliminating all mention of dates from my litanies. I am not a fan of time to begin with, and I feel a special antipathy toward this tendency to self-referentialize by feebly impregnating remarks with the significance of artificial context — that context being the presumed importance of comments in the greater time horizon, the wider spectrum of experience, an expanse of time which, in fact, does nothing but confirm the vanquishment from history of the 99-cent clip-on light by which (partly, with the light of the computer screen) I type these words. I woke up this morning and attempted to wash dishes, but instead cut myself in the hand, cut by the blade of a blender, the black muscle of my right hand dug into and bloodied by the Cuisinart that last saw action mixing popover batter. I am not clumsy but when these incidents occur I concern myself not with the pain or the gushing blood but with the stupidity. The dull movements of picking up the blender, unscrewing its base, then feeling the base slip and propel from my hand and then my hand, stupidly, reaching for the base (which contains the blade) and the blade sinking into the tough muscles. After bandaging it I found myself subconsciously avoiding use of my fifth finger while playing piano, and even while typing — a prestidigitational lipogram. Piano playing, while not most people’s idea of athleticism, is a more muscular act than pecking out words at these cheap plastic keys. Piano playing is a re-creative act, though, and in my exertions I find that re-creation is a simpler and less vulnerable movement to make with these hands than creation. This little injury will fix itself soon enough. I heal quickly, but not since college have I been fully unable to play piano with one of my hands. I would go bananas if I lost the ability to play piano. I feel my inner sanctum lose some of its balance if I sit and play through music written for the left hand alone. I skipped ahead to Mahler’s 5th Symphony, a work which I find comical and crude at times. Certain moments of purportedly highest drama in this work sound to me like Van Halen. It is scattershot how memory works. I already forgot why, moments ago, the memory of a confused line cook at a college cafeteria passed through my mind. One Sunday afternoon, with nowhere else to go for food in that tiny, tiny town, I found myself in line behind 3 other people waiting to place orders from a friendly but hapless man assigned to work the grill. Everything confused him, and waiting in that line for 78 minutes felt then like those hours I experienced later in life (another concoction of relevance via temporal assignment) where rising from bed felt impossible, my body grimly locked in sleep from which I could not wake. The first moments of death must be this way. Now I am hearing the Herbert Hamilton Harty Piano Concerto. I had something more to say here. Something. This is a miniature form of exile, here in this corner, here in the confused combat between hot and cold. I had a moment of reaching under the zeitgeist this week. A review of a new publication of Flaubert’s letters described the author’s account of his stolid reaction to the death of a close relative. It woke me up, that brief quotation.
∞
I made two bus trips to upstate New York this year. On those trips I noticed billboards with phone numbers using the old Telephone Exchange Name format. The signs passed by so fast I was unable to get photos of them, and I did not think to write them down, but I seem to remember the phone numbers belonged to real estate agents in the area. It seemed like a deliberate attempt to revive Telephone Exchange Names, an old practice of making phone calls in a way that included the name of the neighborhood in which the person being called lived.
The Exchange Name system fell out of general use long ago, but I wonder if its revival upstate is inspired by the Telephone Exchange Name Project web site, a long-time favorite of mine that I check in on once in a while if only to make sure it still exists. If you do not know what a Telephone Exchange Name is or why I think it is special to see them then give the above-mentioned link a quick read. The TEN Project collects exchange names from old phone books, personal recollection, and other sources, and encourages a common sense revival of Exchange Names today. I referred to the TEN Project today after getting together these photos of telephone exchange names I have seen around NYC. Some years ago I considered making a single project of this and assembling as many of these sightings as possible, but it seemed cliché. Public signage bearing exchange name numbers from generations ago are not common but they endure, often quite visibly at companies very much still in business. This first photo shows the giant Steinway Storage Warehouse in Long Island City, seen by thousands of daily commuters from the Queens-bound side of the Queensboro/59th Street Bridge.
AS8-9090, AStoria 8-9090, Steinway Storage Warehouse
I spotted this fine specimen in Astoria, and marveled not so much at how this company still has its Exchange Name number over its front door but at how it is practically the only forward-facing telephone number they have on their place of business. (They have their modern phone numbers in the lower right of the front window). Millionaire Realty appears to have been in Astoria for a very, very long time, and has the confidence to show it. Looking for a place in Astoria? Dial zero and ask the operator for Astoria 4-5500, or AS4-5500.
AS4-5500, AStoria 4-5500
The MU in True Value Lumber Boys’ old-format phone number stands for Murray Hill. The Lumber boys have their modern phone number posted above their exchange name number, but I noticed that they still don’t have an area code.
MU3-0410, MUrray Hill 3-0410
The next sighting is from the Upper East Side of Manhattan, where a locksmith still uses its TRafalgar exchange name to advertise its business phone number of TR9-2740.
TR9-2740, TRafalgar 9-2740
The Sutton Clock Shop on 61st Street at Lexington Avenue added the 212 area code but kept its exchange-name-formatted number of PL8-2260. PL stands for “PLaza”: PLaza 8-2260.
PLaza 8-2260, Sutton Clock Shop
Even if it did not contain a Telephone Exchange Name this next picture would be pretty amazing anyway. This shot of Times Square in 1942 comes from my gigormous collection of amateur slides and found photos, and appears to have been taken by a Colorado family visiting Manhattan in 1942. Print and film media of the day make it tempting to think that the 1940s literally existed in black and white, but Kodachrome slides like this give the lie to that assumption. Full color steps from the past, in this case showing the PEnnsylvania Telephone Exchange Name advertising empty billboard space over a Ruppert Beer sign. There is a lot of other amazing detail in this picture, but for the purposes of this discussion the Pennsylvania 6-5300 phone number that towers over Times Square is today assigned to the Block, O’Toole, & Murphy law firm under the modern formatting of (212) 736-5300. I wonder if that law firm is aware that its phone number once soared over the crossroads of the world, and what they would have to pay for the privilege today?
Times Square, 1942. PEnnsylvania 6-5300
The San Remo Tailor Shop on Steinway Street in Astoria still invites you to call them at AStoria8-7979. I first posted this Exchange Name Number a few years ago. You can see a fuller picture of this sign here. It is from my series of pictures of signage which, for one reason or another, caught my eye.
AStoria-8-7979, San Remo Tailor Shop
This sign showing the Adams Real Estate Company’s old-format number is also from my signage series, and was first posted there a few years ago. The Adams Real Estate company still exists and uses the same number as they did generations ago. No longer ORegon 9-5500 you can dial the Adams company directly — without operator assistance! — by dialing (212) 679-5500.
ORegon 9-5500, Adams Real Estate
I borrowed the next Exchange Name sighting from my Faded Signs series, which is another photo set I add to once in a while. ALgonquin 4-1817 was the number for a real estate company at 450 Sixth Avenue. If you look closely at some of my other Faded Sign pictures maybe you’ll be able to make out other Exchange Name numbers in the barely-readable text that still survives from decades ago. The modern version of this old phone number — 212-244-1817 — belongs to Guess Handbags, located at 320 5th Avenue.
ALgonquin 4-1817
According to the Sunnyside Chamber of Commerce web site: “Billharz Plumbing, Inc. has been family-owned and operated for three generations since 1927 – Henri X. Billharz, Robert H. Billharz and Henri J. Billharz are licensed and certified.”
One of the signs on the Billharz Plumbing building still shows its exchange name number of STillwell 4-2468, but in these modern times the number is (718) 784-2468.
ST4-2468, STillwell 4-2468
The front windows of the Astoria Finast Window Company were the scene of a memorable exchange between the owners of Finast and an anonymous telephone caller who left unkind messages on the store’s answering machine. The message began with “To The Gargage That Spit And Put Stickers On My Window”. The rest of the message can be read here. It is part of my Typos, Engrish, and Other Public Grammar Gaffes section to which I add pictures once in a while.
Today the signage at the Astoria Finast Window shop is notable for its Telephone Exchange Name phone number, though the company seems to have tried to gloss over this relic of its past. I would expect any company to be proud of this tell-tale sign of its longevity. Nevertheless, Like Astoria Finast, many long-time companies sanded over or obliterated their Exchange Name numbers, replacing them with modern phone numbers.
Pick up your rotary dial phone and dial 0, then ask for RAvenswood 1-2089 to talk to someone at Astoria Finast Window Company.
RAvenswood 1-2089
The penultimate sighting in this set is from a company called Metro Systems Corp. Their number is most likely STillwell 6-0640. I say “most likely” because I want so much to believe that there was once a STeinway telephone exchange name in this part of Queens. I doubt there was, as the Telephone Exchange Name Project web site has no mention of it, but I allow myself to imagine what might have been within a field of knowledge known to be incomplete.
ST6-0640, STillwell 6-0640, Metro Systems Corp.
Like my first sighting, this last one shows another highly visible Telephone Exchange Name specimen. This one is located on Astoria Boulevard, at the highly-trafficked crossroads connecting the Grand Central Parkway, Triborough Bridge, and BQE. This number uses the RAvenswood exchange, which happens to be the exchange of my land line phone.
RA8-5660, RAvenswood 8-5660
I do not know what company used to own the RA8-5660 number. Today, however, this phone number so visible to passers-by would translate to 718-728-5660. That number belongs to a place called “Acupuncture & Acupressure”, a small shop located on Broadway in Astoria. I wonder if that company is aware that its phone number is blasted across the side of a nearby building, albeit in Telephone Exchange Number format.
∞
Florida Waterfront
I spent most of my youth in Florida, and lived for a year in a house situated similarly to the homes in this picture. We lived in a house at the end of a canal, our yard just above sea-level. Our grass did not run into the water as does the weedy growth seen in this picture. Our pier was not the obvious safety hazard seen in this picture. Our pier was well-built, its perimeter surrounded by a solid wood fence against which I leaned heavily while fishing or staring into the dark waters of Tampa Bay. Fishing was done in our back yard but in such shallow waters we knew that catfish would be our heartiest catch.
The waters at the end of the canal were a tantalizing void into which I stared. At low tide I saw horseshoe crabs, stingrays, catfish, turtles of widely varying sizes, and other mysterious-to-me sea creatures that seemed lost, having wandered far from the open waters into the dead-end gulley that was a place of random theater. At low tide the creatures would get trapped in the disappeared waters, forced to wait for the tide to return so they could swim again. Sometimes I saw horseshoe crabs flipped over, immobile, their creepy-crawly pedipalps and pusher legs flailing in the hot sun. We had a long stick which we sometimes used to flip these crabs back on their feet, but the gesture often failed to return them to open water.
The water was dangerous. There were no fences along the water’s edge. The boy who lived next door once fell in. I did not know what to do. I ran to the front door of his house, opening the door without knocking or ringing the doorbell, looking for James’ father. I ran into the living saw James’ father, sitting calmly in his easy chair reading a newspaper. I yelled “James fell into the canal!” and the man spontaneously threw the paper aside and leaped from his chair, a reflex action for which he needed no training. He ran out to the yard and pulled James from the water, the boy’s body soaked in the filthy, mangy water of Tampa Bay.
James considered me his hero after this incident. He claimed I saved his life. Had I not run for help he said he would have drowned, or been rabidly stabbed and then feed-frenzied by a haul of swordfish. James lavished me with tokens of appreciation, ceremonially presented to me in the safe space under the trees that separated our yards. One of his gifts was a tennis ball he found floating in the canal. Another gift was a pile of leaves and branches he collected from the trees in his yard.
The fear of falling into the canal was no joke among residents of those houses lining the waterway. I never fell in but after James did I heard the stories of others who stumbled into deeper waters further up the road. These tales, told by men younger than I am now, needed no fanciful exaggerations but were nevertheless embellished with fantasy creatures and impossible scenarios. Alligators were commonly seen in the waters but never the swordfish that some parents claimed would impale our little bodies should we dive in to these waters. Piranha are freshwater creatures from South America but that didn’t stop some chucklehead parents from swearing that a swarm of them patrolled the canal, waiting to leap from the water and munch on the face of any child caught staring.
These tales informed the respectful distance I kept from the canal, but they also fed the panic that arose like encroaching sea filth when the waters rose high and our back yard flooded. Never did the floodwaters reach more than a few feet past the sea wall but this small overflow removed the point of division between the sea and the land, and it fed my nightmares with images of sea creatures wandering onto the land, curiously poking around and picking through the things of a human. The theater stepped from the stage. I mostly feared those horseshoe crabs, which I knew from school to be mobile creatures. I thought of them as giant cockroaches — not out of any disdain but simply because to me they resembled the hard-shelled, oversized cockroaches I saw and sometimes heard hissing on our porch.
The waters covered our yard and I tried to sleep, knowing for sure that my room would fill with horseshoe crabs and turtles and their mucky cast of cronies. I do not know what happened. I do not know what parade of visitors rose from the canal to inspect my sleep but I know my room filled to the ceiling with filthy bay water and swirling schools of stingrays and swordfish.
∞
The problem with The Chair is that it is too comfortable. It is a comfort zone, a place of luxury and casual wealth which placates the rare sparks of my mind. Where is work done in our day? Once in a while I’ll see a profile of an influential thinker at an industry-leading company, the face behind the brand name, the mover of markets who gloriously labored in sphynxian silence and corporate anonymity until a print magazine found the individual and published a 12-page profile. You might imagine that such an important person has a workplace of some eccentricity — an 80" television or a custom-made aquarium shaped like an obscure Pacific island — but usually the person’s place of work is just a desk with a computer, a place which is, by appearances, the same as any desk at any similar place of employment. The value of the work performed there is said to rise to a higher level, to be of greater financial value to the employers and of greater value to society, but are not the machinations the same as the obscure laborer slaving away on data entry? Does a corporate celebrity not punch the same keys as their "underlings"? They do, but we are told it is done with more prescience, education, and a special form of contextual erudition known as “vision”. My corporate youth was filled with puzzlement over authority and rank at the workplace, especially the language used to express it. A particularly stark memo from my boss said that a document had been sent to "the people upstairs" even though said people were actually downstairs from us. They were "upstairs" from us not in physical reality but in the corporate pile. Employees whose compensation was considerably higher than their peers and even their bosses were described as "in the stratosphere." Spatial comparisons to corporate rank were funny to me, not for any cleverness they exhibited but because of what they revealed about the speaker’s anxieties and disillusions. An assistant once described a director as "BIG". She mockingly rolled her eyes and waved her hands, doing a little razzle-dazzle dance with her fingers to illustrate what BIG meant to her.
∞
Update: 10.30.2009: If you own a Pacific Image PowerSlide 3650 and have tales to tell from your use of it, check my Pacific Image PowerSlide 3650 Message Board, which as of yet contains postings only from myself.
I stopped scanning slides for a while, but this week I started back at it. I stopped partly because I was tired of it but also because the slide scanner was hocking up crazy stuff, malfunctioning so badly that I just said to hell with it. I did what any reasonable person would do. I stopped using it. I gave it a break. And when I resumed using the thing, it worked fine. I guess it overheated. The scanner is a Pacific Imaging PowerSlide 3650. It is a crazy contraption. I like the PowerSlide 3650 but it is not an easy-going, hands-off device. Getting this thing to do what I expect of it is a team effort. When it works it just churns away, spitting out decent-quality scans of my collection of thousands of slides. When it does not work I could blow a gasket. The scanner jams. It jams a lot, and when it jams it produces an awful hacking noise, the metal arm mechanism pounding at the hapless little 2″x2″ slide, occasionally ingesting said slide and thrusting it into the abyss of the scanner’s innards. These slides are destroyed, and by special dispensation of the company that makes the scanner I was allowed to disassemble the PowerSlide 3650 and pull the remains of some annihilated slides from inside — without voiding the warranty on the device. I had to do this because they were jamming the scanner from within, rendering the device useless. The first slide pictured here was 52 years old before the PowerSlide 3650 made it look like it had been chewed up and spit out by a cud-chewing beast. The second slide is from 1976 and looks like it was held under a blowtorch.
I do not mean to trash the PowerSlide 3650 scanner, though. Having called it out by name and manufacturer I guess I should make it clear that these mangled slides are rare. I have scanned over 10,000 slides with the PowerSlide 3650 and so far I have only lost 3 slides in the manner described. Those slides were in poor condition to begin with and maybe they should not have been committed to the jam-happy PowerSlide 3650. I say “maybe” because I can not understand why the 3650 jams on some slides but not others. Perfect slides are as likely to jam as bent or damaged slides. I decided not to use the PowerSlide 3650 to scan some older glass mounted slides. I never tried it but the possibility of shattering the glass in a scanner jam was enough to make me scan those on the CanoScan 8800f flatbed scanner with the slides attachment. The image quality is not as good but I do not want to risk crushing the slides, which are from the 1940s.
The idiosyncrasies of the PowerSlide 3650 are tolerable for the career hobbyist in me but disappointment lingers. I imagined I could run a side business with it, loading up 100 slides at a time and scanning them at 25¢ a pop while I slept or did other things. I could not, as part of a business endeavor, promise anything to a paying customer with this thing. It is too high-maintenance a device. This is probably a good thing, though. It keeps me from turning into the Robin Williams character in One Hour Photo, a movie I liked but which came up a little short of its intentions. I hate to say it but for me the most enduring image from that film is of Robin Williams sitting on the can, taking a dump in the bathroom of his obsession’s house.
I started scanning slides back in March, and since then I have sought out complete sets of family slides, sets which span decades and capture those milestones and milliseconds endemic to ordinary life. There have been some glorious gems in all those slides. A color shot of Times Square in 1942 looks like no image I have seen of that well-documented crossroad. The place looks so small in 1942. Today Times Square looks like a wannabe Las Vegas that suddenly turned into a trailer park with its $2 lawn chairs and bargain-basement pedestrian accoutrements. Slides from the early 1940s also get my attentions, not just for the color quality but for the fact that America in the 1940s is remembered as a black and white era by those of us who arrived after. Media memories command authority, and if World War II was reported on television and in print in black and white then most of us human beings whose lives did not touch the 1940s will imagine the battlefields and the soldiers themselves as black and white creatures.
The slides have acres of dreck about them. Miles to go between blurry, deteriorated slides of Niagara Falls and a clear, real image of a city street. Lives all start to look the same. Americans go to Cypress Gardens, Key West, Daytona Beach, and Weeki Wachee. They go to The Wisconsin Dells, Yosemite, Yellowstone, the Grand Canyon and the Black Hills. Who cares? Why even record these mundane adventures, already repeated and recorded by infinite others. Why document anything? Is it because human memory has for centuries been presumed to be fallible? Unreliable? What keeps drawing me back in to these mountains of engrammatic detritus, these human memory piles?
It must be the pictures. I love the pictures. I click through hundreds of them a day, assaying the memories of the dead as if they are my own.
Update: 10.30.2009: If you own a Pacific Image PowerSlide 3650 and have tales to tell from your use of it, check my Pacific Image PowerSlide 3650 Message Board, which as of yet contains postings only from myself.
∞
∞
A text message arrived earlier, alerting me that my bank card starting with 511182 had been deactivated. I should call 888-950-5553 to reactivate.
888-950-5553
I knew this was bogus, though I might not have been so immediately sure of its bogosity had the same thing not happened to D several months ago, and also on a Saturday. She received a text message alerting her that her account had been compromised, and to call a toll-free number to restore access. The wording, as I remember it, was virtually identical to the message I got, and she quickly found that it was just another type of spoofing scam.
Other clues about the text message seemed to point to its sketchiness. The random capitalizations of first letters did not seem right, and the way it tried to identify my card number with its first 6 numbers and not the last 4 or 5 numbers seemed uncharacteristic of a legitimate bank communication. Nevertheless I checked my card and of course found that I have no account number or bank card that begins with 511182. I then looked up the toll-free number on some search engines and found nothing of any substance, though I would not consider search engine presence as proof of anything conclusive.
I knew it was fake but I decided to call the number anyway, just to see what it sounded like, and to see how the scam was supposed to unfold. I did not call from my cell phone or land line. I called from a payphone. I did not want Caller ID phishing (if that was a part of the scam) to deliver any personally identifiable information of mine to the fraudsters.
The first time I dialed the number I got a message saying all circuits were busy. I called again and when it rang I was immediately tipped off by something that might be considered pretty subtle: The phone rang once, and then quickly rang a second time. To me this suggested that the call was being forwarded to somewhere else. The guttersnipes must have hijacked a dormant or unused toll-free number and used its voicemail software to forward calls to their Call Center of Iniquity. If this was true then it answered my only real question about this scam, which was how an outlaw operation was allowed to get a toll-free number. I am sure it happens but my guess is that they did not own the 8889505553 number, but likely used common phone phreaking or social engineering techniques to take it over from someone else. I could be wrong about this but it made sense as it passed through my stream of consciousness.
I notice that this alert came on a Saturday, as did the similar alert D received some months ago. Our two incidents do not a valid sample make but if it represents a broader pattern then it might suggest that the voicemail system and toll-free number — if they were in fact being hijacked — were being used while its owners are out of the office or otherwise unawares.
A pathetic sounding robot voice answered and announced that I had reached “Chase 24-hour Card Activation.” To enter my credit card number I should press 1, to hang up press pound, and I think there was another option. To me it sounded crass and phony but I could see where someone in a panic might not listen to the nuances of the automated voice attendant and instead simply head straight to the escape route of re-activating their allegedly dead card. I would also guess that people enter their credit card number without comparing the first six digits of their card to the 6 digits in the text message, either because they don’t have the card with them or because people are more inclined to believe that their bank account information will get stolen then they are inclined to believe that it will not get stolen.
A real bank would not simply send you a text message. They would more likely call you, leave a communication in your online banking, or even mail you a letter. Nevertheless people do choose to get urgent alerts from their financial institutions sent to their cell phones. My identity theft insurance claims I will get a text message if anyone tries to open an account using my personal information. This has not happened — and I doubt it ever will because I have more confidence in the crooks’ ability to bypass these systems than in the banks’ abilities to maintain them — but something in me did perk up in the first instant that I saw this message.
I am sure this scam works.
∞
Older Things »
